Skip to content.

The E-Learning Framework

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home » ELF Project Directory » Course Information Group » 2005-07-27 Liverpool

2005-07-27 Liverpool

The Learning Matrix project aims to deliver a set of services to partner institutions to enable pre-HE and other students to discover, register on, and access resources for bite-size learning offerings. Lead from Liverpool John Moore's University and building on work achieved in the SHELL project and others, the project aims to deliver three strands:

  1. A Course Information Service
  2. Lifelong Learner Records
  3. Personal Development Planning (PDP) Services
XCRI's research assistant, Julie Hardman, and I met with Project Manager Roger Clark and Anthony Beal of West Cheshire College to discuss the first of these. We focused discussion around a pro-forma that the Learning Matrix project planned to send to partner institutions to gather metadata about course offerings for populating their course information service. Although the metadata was to be collected via paper forms our discussion focused on the mapping between required fields and the XML schema that was emerging from discussion between XCRI and the Pathways4Progression project. The proforma was divided into sections with fields for completion in each. Some sections related to the generic description of the course; others related to details of the particular offering of it. Sections and fields are presented below in a table that shows a (XPath style) mapping to elements in the current version of the draft XML schema:

Proforma FieldSchema Element
Whose course is it?
Institution:Specification/owningBody
College Faculty/Division:Specification/owningBody
Department:Specification/owningBody
Contact:Specification/contact/name
Contact email:Specification/contact/email
What course is it?
Title:Specification/title
Institution Course Identifier:Specification/identifier
What kind of course is it?
Level:Specification/educationLevel
Keywords:Specification/subject
JACS Code:Specification/subject[@xsi:type="hesa:jacs"]
What is it about?
Aims:Specification/aim
Outcomes:Specification/outcome[@type="learning" || @type="skill"]
Opportunities:Specification/opportunity[@type="furtherStudy" || @type="career"]
Topics covered:Specification/topic
Teaching:Specification/pedagogy
Assessment:Specification/assessment
Resources required:Specification/resource[@type="required"]
Resources provided:Specification/resource[@type="provided"]
Prerequisites:Specification/prerequisite
Adjustments for disability:Specification/adjustment
Offering Details
Start date:Offering/start
End date:Offering/end
Registration date:Offering/registrationDeadline
Learning hours:Offering/effort[@xsi:type="contactHours"]
Minimum no. places:Offering/enrolMin
Maximum no. places:Offering/enrolMax
Offering contact:Offering/contact/name
Offering contact email:Offering/contact/email
Student support contact:Offering/support/contact/name
Teaching times/places:Offering/teachingTime || Offering/teachingPlace

Points noted in discussion:

Modelling the ownership relationship between the subgroup within the partner institution offering the course and the course itself generated considerable discussion. It was apparent that the Learning Matrix would eventually have partner institutions offering multiple courses. Some facilities available to students were specific to an institution, others were specific to the part of the institution providing the course (the faculty/division/department - terminology varied widely amongst partners), and other facilities were specific to the course. Ideally, a learner would be alerted to the appropriate composite of these when viewing course offerings. These owning organisation entities might well have multiple identifiers, one for each coding scheme that recognised or reported upon their existence. This discussion led us to the conclusion that Curriculum Specifications would need to make reference to Organisational Entities (as Norway's CDM does), against which multiple identifiers, descriptions of facilities, and links to further information (maps, photos, etc) could be stored.

As Learning Matrix was hoping to offer bite-size short courses to students, typically from non-traditional backgrounds, in a blended learning mode, it was important that potential students understood where, when and how the course would operate. It was felt that the teachingTime and teachingPlace elements of the Offering would hold important information in this regard. Convenience of engagement and fit with existing workload and lifestyle appeared to be strong determinants of the attractiveness of a short course. Ideally a timetable of contact sessions and some narrative about the intervening workload would be provided, but it was agreed that the modelling of this kind of data would also needed to facilitate location-based searches (eg by postcode). The importance was also noted of giving a clear idea of effort required, both face-to-face contact and study outside.

The nature of the proposed learning packages on offer through the Learning Matrix was such that many would not have a formal education level. UKOLN's work on vocabularies for educationLevel was noted, and the prospect of formally recording level = none and making some statement about the intended audience was considered a possible solution. Discussion of constrained vocabularies was also raised by the JACS subject field. During the meeting this was considered one possible way of identifying the course subject area against a nationally recognised coding scheme. Other possibilites might include LearnDirect's classification, eg:
(<dc:subject xsi:type="rdnterms:Learndirect">English literature, FC.4</dc:subject>)

Created by stubbsy
Last modified 2005-08-01 07:11 PM
Funding Partner
JISC Distributed eLearning Strand
« May 2012 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Files and Documents
Implements services
Related ELF services
No files or documents.